Review found three robustness gaps:
- set -e + command substitution let a mailman-web that exits 3 abort the
script with exit 3, colliding with the reserved "nothing archived" code
so a caller could treat a failed export as empty. Wrap the invocation in
`... ) || { ...; exit 1; }` so every exporter failure normalizes to 1
and can never be read as 3.
- Crash durability missed a newly-created output directory: only the leaf
dir was fsynced after the rename, not the parent holding that new dir
entry. Create the output tree in-process and fsync each new level into
its parent before reporting success.
- A same-uid process could swap the /var/tmp temp for a FIFO; an
O_RDONLY open without O_NONBLOCK blocks forever before the regular-file
check, hanging the job instead of failing closed. Open with
O_NOFOLLOW|O_NONBLOCK, then fstat and reject anything non-regular.
Verified: mailman-web exit 3 -> script exit 1 (NONE still 3, garbage 1);
FIFO source -> rejected in <5s, no hang; publish into a missing nested
dir creates it durably and writes 0600; existing-dir path unregressed.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| mm3-hk-export | ||
| README.md | ||
mm3-hk-export
Export a private HyperKitty (Mailman 3) list archive to an mbox file from
the command line: the scriptable equivalent of clicking the web UI's
Download button, so it fits a backup-and-destroy loop without manual
browser steps.
Why this exists
HyperKitty has no hyperkitty_export management command; the only built-in
export is the web "Download" view (gated by the HYPERKITTY_MBOX_EXPORT
setting). This script reproduces that view's exact output by calling the same
Email.as_bytes() code path on each archived message, driven through Debian's
mailman-web wrapper: no web login, no direct database reconstruction.
The archives live in the mailman-web / HyperKitty database, which is
separate from Mailman core. That is why the export must go through
mailman-web (not mailman / mailman-wrapper, whose shell only sees core).
Requirements
- Debian-style Mailman 3 with the
mailman-webwrapper onPATH(Django site at/usr/share/mailman3-web/, HyperKitty installed). - Run as root:
mailman-webdrops privileges to the web user to read the archive, and the script (as root) moves the finished file into place. - Optional, only to enrich the "not archived" notice: the
mailman-wrappercore CLI (for a best-effortarchive_policylookup viamailman shell, reading core's DB directly, no REST, no credentials). Missing it just falls back to a generic message.
Usage
mm3-hk-export [-z|--gzip] <list@domain> [output]
outputdefaults to./<localpart>.mbox(./<localpart>.mbox.gzwith-z).-z/--gzipgzip-compresses the stream, matching the web download's.mbox.gzbyte-for-byte (deterministic header,mtime=0);.gzis appended to the output name if absent.
Examples:
mm3-hk-export announce@lists.example.com /root/mm3/announce.mbox
mm3-hk-export --gzip announce@lists.example.com /root/mm3/announce.mbox.gz
Outcomes and exit codes
The script never writes a partial or empty file. The exit code tells a caller exactly what happened, most importantly whether a backup was produced:
| Situation | HyperKitty state | Result | Exit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archive has messages | row with N emails | writes the mbox, prints wrote N messages to … |
0 |
| Archived but empty | row, 0 emails | no file, prints an "empty archive" notice | 3 |
| No archive at all | no MailingList row |
no file; consults core archive_policy to say whether the list is never-archived or simply has nothing archived yet |
3 |
| Usage / bad address | n/a | usage message | 2 |
Genuine error (e.g. mailman-web failing) |
n/a | underlying output on stderr | 1 |
Exit 3 ("nothing to archive") is deliberately distinct from 0 ("archive
written"). A genuinely empty or never-archived list is a normal, expected
outcome, but it is not a successful backup, so a backup-and-destroy caller
can refuse to delete a list whose archive was never captured (see below).
In a backup-and-destroy loop
mkdir -p /root/mm3
for list in list1 list2; do
addr="$list@domain.tld"
mm3-hk-export "$addr" "/root/mm3/$list.mbox"
case $? in
0) ;; # archive written; safe to proceed
3) # nothing to archive (empty / no archive):
# no backup file exists, so by default do
# not destroy. Override only if you mean it.
if [ "${ALLOW_NO_ARCHIVE:-0}" != 1 ]; then
echo "skip: $addr has no archive to back up; not removing" >&2
continue
fi ;;
*) echo "skip: $addr export failed; not removing" >&2; continue ;;
esac
mailman-wrapper members "$addr" > "/root/mm3/$list.members" \
|| { echo "skip: $addr member dump failed; not removing" >&2; continue; }
mailman-wrapper remove "$addr"
done
The loop destroys a list only when its archive was actually written
(exit 0) and its member roster was dumped. A list with nothing to archive
(exit 3) is left intact unless you opt in with ALLOW_NO_ARCHIVE=1, so a
transient or unexpected "no archive" can never silently authorise a delete.
Export before remove, and never remove on a failed backup. (HyperKitty's
archive lives in a separate database and is not deleted by core's remove, but
a failed export must still halt the destroy step.)
Caveats
- Reconstruction, not the raw original. HyperKitty rebuilds each message
from parsed fields:
From,To,Subject,Date,Message-ID,In-Reply-To, body, and attachments. Headers likeCc,References,List-*, and customX-*are not preserved. This is inherent to HyperKitty; the manual web download has the identical limitation. - Memory. Messages are streamed with a DB iterator and written incrementally, avoiding the web export's known blow-up on large lists.
- Re-import. The output is valid mbox (proper
Fromseparators,From-mangled bodies) and can be re-imported withhyperkitty_import. - Handoff integrity. The archive is written by the privilege-dropped web
user into
/var/tmp, then published by root. Root opens that file withO_NOFOLLOW, copies it while computing a SHA-256, and refuses to publish unless the digest matches the one the exporter computed over the bytes it wrote, so a same-uid process that swaps, truncates, or corrupts the temp file between export and publish is caught (the run fails, nothing is published, and the destroy loop will not remove the list). A fully compromised mailman-web process is out of scope: it builds the archive from a database it already controls, so no file-level check downstream can vouch for the content it produced.